Did Wittgenstein Write on Shakespeare?
Keywords:
20th century philosophy, Wittgenstein Ludwig, Shakespeare William, poetry, Culture and Value, romanticismAbstract
It is often claimed that certain remarks by Wittgenstein reveal him to have been an unsympathetic reader of Shakespeare and an unappreciative judge of the latter’s achievements. In the present paper, I attempt to show that this sort of observation is not only wrong but due to an inadequate perspective. An examination of the relevant remarks may bring to light a number of more or less interesting principles of evaluation, or aesthetic maxims and appraisals, but these do not say much about Shakespeare’s works, nor are the meant to be instructive in this way. What Wittgenstein’s remarks are really about is his own intellectual physiognomy: it is by way of contrast, by comparing certain features of Shakespeare with what he supposes to be characteristic of himself, that he hopes to learn about the limits and potentialities of his own personality.
References
Abrams, M. H., 1953. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1969. “On the Form of Wittgenstein’s Writing”. In G.E.M. Anscombe, From Plato to Wittgenstein: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe. Ed. M. Geach and L. Gormally, 2011. St Andrews Studies in Philosophy and Public Affairs. Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp.187-192.
Biesenbach, H., 2011. Anspielungen und Zitate im Werk Ludwig Wittgensteins. Publications from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, No 22. Bergen: The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen.
Canetti, E., 1980. Die Fackel im Ohr. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Engelmann, P., 1967. Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein: With a Memoir. Ed. B. McGuinness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Goethe, J. W., 1978. Goethes Werke (Hamburger Ausgabe, ed. Erich Trunz), volume XII: Schriften zur Kunst, Schriften zur Literatur, Maximen und Reflexionen, ed. Erich Trunz, Hans Joachim Schrimpf; Herbert v. Einem, 8th edition, München: C. H. Beck, 1978: Zum Shakespeares-Tag, pp. 224-227; Shakespeare und kein Ende, pp. 287-298.
Heine, H., 1978. Sämtliche Schriften, Bd. 3. 2nd ed., ed. K. Briegleb. München: Hanser.
Herder, J. G., 1978, Herders Werke in fünf Bänden, volume II, ed. Regine Otto, Berlin & Weimar: Aufbau-Verlag, 1978, pp. 201-226.
Huemer, W. (forthcoming). “The Character of a Name: Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Shakespeare”. In: S. Bru, W. Huemer and D. Steuer, eds., Wittgenstein Reading. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Huemer, W., 2012. “Misreadings: Steiner and Lewis on Wittgenstein and Shakespeare”. Philosophy and Literature, 36, pp. 229-237.
Kraus, K. , 1994. Theater der Dichtung: Shakespeare. In K. Kraus, Schriften, Vol. 15. Ed. C. Wagenknecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Lessing, G. E., 1973. Werke, ed. H. G. Göpfert, volume V: Literaturkritik, Poethik und Philologie, ed. Jörg Schönert, München: Hanser, 1973, pp. 70-73.
Lewis. P., 2005. “Wittgenstein, Tolstoy, and Shakespeare”. Philosophy and Literature, 28, pp. 241-255.
McGuinness, B. 2002. “Freud and Wittgenstein”. In B. McGuiness, Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, pp. 224-235.
McGuinness, B., 2012. “Introduction”. In B. McGuiness, Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents, 1911-1951. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1-14.
Monk, R., 1991. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage.
Rhees, R., ed., 1984. Recollections of Wittgenstein. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schiller, Fr. 1992. Theoretische Schriften. Ed. R.-P. Janz. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.
Schiller, Fr. 2004. Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5. Ed. W. Riedel. München: Hanser.
Schulte, J., 2013. “Wittgenstein sulla filosofia come poesia”. In E. Caldarola, D. Quattrocchi and G. Tomasi, eds. 2013. Wittgenstein, l’estetica e le arti. Roma: Carocci editore, pp. 157-177. Also forthcoming in English: “Wittgenstein on Philosophy as Poetry”.
Schulte, J., 2013b. “Wittgenstein’s Debt to Plato”. In L. Perissinotto and B. Ramón Cámara, eds. 2013. Wittgenstein and Plato: Connections, Comparisons and Contrasts. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-24.
Steiner, G., 1996. “A Reading against Shakespeare”. In G. Steiner, No Passion Spent: Essays 1978-1995. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 108-128.
Wittgenstein, L. , 1980. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Ed. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [RPP I]
Wittgenstein, L., 1969. On Certainty. Ed. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, trans. D. Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.[OC]
Wittgenstein, L., 1977. Remarks on Colour. Ed. G.E.M. Anscombe, trans. L. McAlister and M. Schättle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [ROC]
Wittgenstein, L., 1977. Vermischte Bemerkungen. Ed. G.H. von Wright and H. Nyman. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Wittgenstein, L., 1992. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 2. Ed. G.H. von Wright and H. Nyman, trans. C.G. Luckhardt and M.A.E. Aue. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [LW II]
Wittgenstein, L., 1998. Culture and Value. 2nd ed., ed. G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman, revised by A. Pichler, trans. P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L., 2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition. Ed. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L., 2009. “Philosophy of Psychology – A Fragment [previously known as ‘Part II’]”. In Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed., ed. P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. [PPF]
Published
Issue
Section
License
NWR uses the Creative Commons license CC-BY.
Vol. 1-3 used CC-BY-NC-SA. The collected works copyright ownership for Vol. 1-2 were shared by Nordic Wittgenstein Society and ontos Verlag/De Gruyter.
